|
|
|
|
|
|
| An incident record on a status page, filed under Funding and Payouts rather than under card acceptance. Its resolution text does the work of the whole episode: the technical issue is resolved, and some customers scheduled to receive funding on 24 June will receive funds on 25 June, one day later than expected according to the customer funding cycle. No number of affected merchants appears. The earlier entry in the same incident says only that technical resources are working to process the affected files. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
| When one retail withdrawal channel closes or fails, demand concentrates on whichever channel is left open, and the capacity of that channel sets what a depositor can obtain. |
| Observed: Northern Rock 2007, Cyprus 2013, India 2016, Greece 2015, United States 1933, Argentina 2001, Lebanon 2019, Worldpay 2026. |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
| A currency replacement can require physical modification of each cash dispensing machine before the new notes can be issued, so the machine estate returns to service site by site rather than at once. |
| Observed: India 2016. |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
| Withdrawal limits imposed on a domestic banking system can be written to exempt cards issued outside it, so one machine dispenses under two rules according to where the card was issued. |
| Observed: Greece 2015. |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
| Domestic payment and deposit channels can continue operating while cross-border payment routes fail, with the central bank standing in as the intermediary for payments to and from the country. |
| Observed: Iceland 2008. |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
| When the institutions that convert payment instruments into cash are closed, wages and checks already received cannot be spent, and merchants and carriers extend their own credit in place of the missing conversion. |
| Observed: United States 1933. |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
| A public employer short of the national currency can pay wages in an instrument it issues itself, which then circulates alongside the currency it stands in for. |
| Observed: Argentina 2001. |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
| Withdrawal restrictions can be imposed by individual institutions and their trade association rather than by statute, so the limit differs from bank to bank and no law governs it. |
| Observed: Lebanon 2019. |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
| A cash withdrawal ceiling set in nominal units has to be raised alongside the note denominations that pay it, because the ceiling can only be dispensed in the notes that exist. |
| Observed: Zimbabwe 2008. |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
| A payment outage can hit card authorisation and merchant funding as separate faults, so acceptance at the terminal is restored while the money owed to the merchant arrives a day late under its own incident notice. |
| Observed: Worldpay 2026. |
|
|
|
|
| Changed today: Entry 1 gained Worldpay 2026, where card authorisation failed for several hours and the queues moved to the cash machines while venues took cash only. Entry 9 added, on authorisation and merchant funding failing as separate rails under separate notices. |
|